Global trends in the prevalence and incidence of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of affective disorders, 2021•Elsevier
Background There is mixed evidence regarding the change in the prevalence of depression
in the general population over time. This study aimed to synthesise the evidence on studies
that use equivalent approaches in equivalent populations across different time points.
Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies focused on the change over
time in depression incidence and prevalence in the general population. A random-effects
meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled effect for the change in the prevalence …
in the general population over time. This study aimed to synthesise the evidence on studies
that use equivalent approaches in equivalent populations across different time points.
Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies focused on the change over
time in depression incidence and prevalence in the general population. A random-effects
meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled effect for the change in the prevalence …
Background
There is mixed evidence regarding the change in the prevalence of depression in the general population over time. This study aimed to synthesise the evidence on studies that use equivalent approaches in equivalent populations across different time points.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted to identify studies focused on the change over time in depression incidence and prevalence in the general population. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled effect for the change in the prevalence estimates between the first and last time points considered. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to ascertain differences in the effect sizes by gender, age group, prevalence type, elapsed time between cross-sections, and depression operationalisation.
Results
19 studies provided information on the change in depression prevalence over time, whereas none provided such information regarding incidence. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were estimated by using 17 studies: OR=1.35 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.61). Similar pooled effects were obtained for females and males, separately. The high heterogeneity across studies was not explained by any of the design variables considered. No evidence for publication bias was found.
Limitations
The review included published articles up to August 2018, and the information of studies with more than two time points was summarised in a single estimate of change.
Conclusions
There is a predominant increasing trend in the likelihood of experiencing depression over time that seems not to be explainable by study design differences or publication bias alone.
Elsevier
